Guilt, Suffering, Confession and Redemption in Crime and...

Guilt, Suffering, Confession and Redemption in Crime and Punishment You keep lying! screamed Raskolnikov, no longer able to restrain himself. Youre lying, you damned clown! And he flung himself on Porfiry, who retired to the doorway, but without a trace of panic. I understand everything, everything! He approached Porfiry. Youre lying and taunting me so Ill give myself away- You cant give yourself away any more than you have already, Rodion Romanovich, old man. Why, youve gone into a state. Dont shout, Ill call my men, sir! (Dostoyevsky, 34) No humane person with any values is able to commit a heinous crime without some feeling of guilt or remorse afterwards. Slowly, this guilt festers and eats away at†¦show more content†¦Both of them had experienced sufferings beyond what one can imagine. Dostoyevsky felt that suffering gives one the chance of puri6cation and transformation. Through his many ordeals of suffering, ranging from the near death of his sick children or his epileptic seizures, to his early imprisonment and exile to Siberia, Dostoyevsky felt that he eventually reached the point of happiness The way of salvation is the way of suffering could often be heard mumbled from Dostoyevskys mouth. For these reasons, critics believe that Raskolnikov may have been a direct symbol of Dostoyevsky and his suffering. (Kjetsaa, 346-349) Dostoyevsky most likely modeled Crime and Punishment after his own experiences. Since the two mens lives had striking similarities, many people believed that was evidence to prove their thinking. As Raskolnikov was overcome with tremendous suffering, sent to Siberia, and fell madly in love with a beautiful woman; so did Dostoyevsky within his lifetime. I do believe that the character (Raskolnikov) was the epitome of Dostoyevskys life. (Timoney) Nightmares Even when Raskolnikov was asleep he received painful messages of others who were suffering, just as he was. In one particular instance, before the double-murder, Raskolnikov is brought back to the poverty he suffered throughout his childhood. He once again feels a great empathy toward the suffered, but this timeShow MoreRelated Life Defined by a Single Moment in Scarlet Letter, Red Badge of Courage, and Crime and Punishment733 Words   |  3 PagesA Life Defined by a Single Moment in Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter, Stephen Cranes Red Badge of Courage, and  Dostoevskys Crime and Punishment    Life can be changed by a decision made during a single moment. Despite the natural gifts of courage or intelligence of a person, a single mistake can isolate him from the rest of society. In one case this can be cause by public conception. The public believes that this person is morally inferior and singles out that person for ridicule. However, itRead MoreAnalysis of Dostoevsky ´s Crime and Punishment Essay example1281 Words   |  6 PagesIn Dostoevskys Crime and Punishment, the murder of the pawnbroker bears little significance when compared to the punishment that Raskolnikov endures. The murder is the direct result of Raskolnikovs Ubermensch theory. Though it takes a while for Raskolnikov to realize the profound mistake in his theory and in his logic, his tedious yet prolific journey eventually leads him to redemption. Suffering, guilt and societal alienation prompt Raskolnikov to reject his Ubermensch theory and ultimatelyRead More Crime and Punishment Essay examples1327 Word s   |  6 PagesCrime and Punishment In his book â€Å"Crime and Punishment†, Dostoevsky explores the path of Raskolnikov who has many problems and obstacles throughout his life. He commits murder and is faced with the long and mentally extremely painful journey of seeking redemption. Raskolnikov believes that by a law of nature men have been â€Å"somewhat arbitrarily† divided into two groups of â€Å"ordinary† and â€Å"extraordinary†. Raskolnikov believes that the duty of the ordinary group is to just exist, in order to formRead MoreThe Postmodern Idea Of Relative Truth1771 Words   |  8 Pagespostmodern ideas in a much more intricate way. The main character of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov, seems to hold many postmodern ideals at the start of the book. He believes that ethics are based on the individual. He actually believes himself to be a kind of â€Å"super-man† who is above the regular moral standards of normal men. It is with this sense of moral ambiguity and relative truth that he commits the murders and expects to feel no guilt for them. As the novel progresses, it becomes clear to RaskolnikovRead MoreAnalysis Of Fyodor Dostoyevskys Crime And Punishment1156 Words   |  5 Pages Fyodor Dostoyevskys Crime and Punishment, an epic tale of suffering and redemption which offers an insightful look at the trials of protagonist Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov after his heinous crime and the struggle that, unbknownst to him, leads to his eventual redemption. The ending of the novel is where this moral and spiritual redmption takes place, here in the cold depths of his assigned Syberian prison, is where Rodya is finnaly able to realize the inner turmoil he faced throughout theRead MoreWhy Do We Dream?2460 Words   |  10 Pagesof psychoanalysis, â€Å"The dream is the liberation of the spirit from the pressure of external nature, a detachment of the soul from the fetters of matter.† (The Interpretation of Dreams) For Raskolnikov, the protagonist of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, his dreams symbolize his journey towards salvation after committing a gruesome murder. Dostoevsky uses dreams as a tool to reveal psychological depth to his characters and establish recurring themes throughout the plot. They provide an insightRead MorePlanning For A Correctional Agency989 Words   |  4 Pagesworldwide. Most people are in favor or against it. The history from capital punishment starts back to colonial time’s .During the colonial times more than 15,000 people have been executed in the United States. The Capital punishment was first introduce early as biblical times for absolute assurance that a criminal s life would end. The followers of Christianity and Judaism claimed to find justification for capital punishment in the Bible. According to the facts, in 1608, the first execution in theRead MoreThe Development Of Individuality In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel Hawthorne1101 Words   |  5 Pagesdevice, which include Hester, Dimmesdale, and Chillingworth. In fact, on more than one occasion, Hawthorne refers back to a â€Å"moral blossom† which symbolizes lessons to be learned. Subsequently, while Hester and Dimmesdale flourish in the light of redemption, Chillingworth deviates from this path and decays in his aggrieved, petulant stubbornness. Hester’s perspective on her sinful action molds and tremendously grows as she deals with the struggles of being an outcast. As she begins her developmentRead MoreCapital Punishment: A Moral and Economic Disaster1619 Words   |  6 PagesCapital Punishment: A Moral and Economic Disaster The average cost for a death penalty case in the United States of America is 2.4 million dollars. Currently, the number of people on death row is 3261. The government, therefore, would have to pay a little over 7.5 billion dollars to execute every single person on death row (â€Å"Death Penalty Statistics†). The United States government can alternatively spend this large sum of money in numerous ways aside from taking people’s lives, such as saving themRead MoreCritical Comparison of Sonia from from Crime and Punishment, and Gretchen from Faust2050 Words   |  9 PagesDostoevsky Sonia in Crime and Punishment and Gretchen in Faust Critical Comparison Sonia from Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment (C amp; P) and Margaret (Gretchen) from Goethe’s Faust are the leading female characters in the works they are portrayed in. Aside from this obvious connection, Sonia and Gretchen have a variety of characteristics in common. Both girls are portrayed in ways that serve as representations of innocence, purity, and faithfulness. Parallels can also be seen in Sonia and

Christopher Columbus The First Of Five Children - 923 Words

Christopher Columbus is perhaps one of today s most celebrated explorers. The Italian voyager was known for navigating to different parts of the world and possibly discovering America. Born in 1451 in Genoa, Italy, Columbus was the first of five children. As a young man, he traveled via sea peddling goods for different employers. He enjoyed navigating so much that he decided to go on an Atlantic odyssey. In order to go on the planned exploration, he needed sponsors. Journeying through sea can be very costly. The adventurer wanted to travel to Asia and explore their markets. Unfortunately, Columbus was turned down when he asked the King of Portugal to finance his trip. Traveling to Asia for them was inconvenient.The Portuguese†¦show more content†¦Recently, Columbus has been receiving a lot of negativity concerning his discoveries of modern day lands. Researchers have shown proven facts that Columbus was not the first to do majority of the things that he is famous for. The most famous of the many controversies is that Columbus did not discover America. According to some people, the Native Americans discovered the modern day United States. There is not any proof online or in books about Columbus ever stating that he discovered lands. He wanted to find gold, silk, and spices (Bentley, Ziegler 457). Even if Columbus was not the first person to make discoveries, he has the right to receive most of the credit. He took goods from other countries and made them universal. Everything that was bought and sold by him is still being used to this day. The explorer opened doors for others to go out, travel, observe, and discover. More opportunities were opening up due to Columbus. If he did not open doors for the men in his field then he would not be a celebrated explorer. He would be known as an unknown man. His only flaw was confusion. If there was modern day technology in 1492, he would have easily found his country of choice. Columbus settled down and got married to Filipa Moniz Perestrelo. Together they had a son named Diego. Columbus had a second son named Ferdinand with a different woman by the name of Beatriz. Although, Columbus has two sons, only one followed in his footsteps. That

The Real World of Technology Free Essays

This essay is in context to Ursula Franklin’s â€Å"Real World of Technology†. Urusla Franklin is an Author, research Physicist, Metallurgist and Educator. She was born on 16th September, 1921 in Munich, Germany. We will write a custom essay sample on The Real World of Technology or any similar topic only for you Order Now She is known for this reading, The Real World of Technology, which is based on her 1989 Massey Lectures, and The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map, a collection of her papers, interviews, and talks. In this reading, the Author, Franklin has named the title â€Å"The Real World of Technology† because she wants to speak out or tell the real truth about technology. She wants spread awareness to the world regarding the ill effects of technology on humanity. If left-unchecked technology will eventually destroy society as we know it. She differentiates the use of technology in the past, what it is at present and what it will be in the future. Franklin illustrates her point by focusing on the effects technology has had on society and cultures in the past. She uses examples from China before the Common Era to the Roman Empire, with a majority of examples coming form the last one hundred and fifty years. Such as the Industrial Revolution and the invention of electronic mail. Franklin contends that for society s sake, people must question everything before accepting new technologies into their world. In the book, Franklin s argument urges people to come together and participate in public reviews and discuss or question technological practices that lead to a world that is designed for technology and not for society. The Real World Of Technology attempts to show how society is affected by every new invention that comes onto the market and supposedly makes life more easy going and hassle free while making work more productive and profitable. The lectures argue that technology has built the house in which we live and that this house is continually changing and being renovated. There is very little human activity outside of the house, and all in habitants are affected by the design of the house, by the division of its space, by the location of its doors and walls. Franklin claims that rarely does society step outside of the house to live, when compared with generations past. The goal for leaving the house is not to enter the natural environment, because in Franklin s terms environment essentially means what is around us that constructed, manufactured, built environment that is the day-in-day-out setting of much of the contemporary world of technology. Nature today is seen as a construct instead of as a force or entity with its own dynamics. The book claims that society vies nature the same way as society views infrastructure as something that is there to accommodate us, to facilitate or be part of our lives, subject to our planning. Franklin writes in-depth about infrastructure and especially technological infrastructure. She claims that since the Industrial Revolution, corporations as well as governments using public funds have invested heavily into technological infrastructures and that: the growth and development of technology has required as a necessary prerequisite a support relationship from governments and public institutions that did not exist in earlier times. Franklin feels that the current environmental crisis that is facing the world–polluted air and water, acid rain and global warming to name a few, are due to the infrastructures built to support technology and its divisible benefits. Because of the newfound relationship between government and the private sector and the fact that these infrastructures can’t be built without the governments of the world, the state is just as much to blame for the current condition of the environment as any polluting cooperation. The difference between a private company and the government, Franklin insists, is that citizens surrendered some of their individual autonomy (and some of their money) to the state for the protection and advancement of the the common good – that is indivisible benefits. When governments do not attempt to stop the destruction caused by the creation of these infrastructures, the government is doing a disservice to its citizens. Just as the Industrial Revolution led to productive and holistic divisions of labor, she fears that new technologies non-communication technologies How to cite The Real World of Technology, Essay examples

Gun Control Discursive Essay Example For Students

Gun Control Discursive Essay Americans are faced with an ever-growing problem of violence. Our streets have become a battleground where the elderly are beaten for their social security checks, where terrified women are viciously attacked and raped, where teen age gangsters shoot it out for a patch of turf to sell their drugs, and where innocent children are caught daily in the crossfire of drive by shootings. We cannot ignore the damage that these criminals are doing to our society, and we must take actions to stop these horrors. However, the effort by some misguided individuals to eliminate the legal ownership of firearms does not address the real problem at hand, and simply disarms the innocent law abiding citizens who are in need of a form of self-defense. The second amendment to the Constitution of the United States makes firearm ownership legal in this country. There were good reasons for this freedom. Firearms have played a big role in the freedom that exists in the United States today. In colonial times, the average American freed themselves from the British. These average American fighters were known as Minutemen. These Minutemen, named because they would pick up their guns and go to the defense of their country on a minutes notice, played a major part in winning the American Revolution. It was for that reason that the founding fathers of this country made the right to keep and bear arms a constitutional right. It wasnt until after the Civil War that the first gun control activists came into play. These were the southern leaders that were afraid that the newly freed black slaves would use their new political rights against them. To avoid this they passed new laws making it illegal for black people to own firearms in many states in the South. It was over a century until the civil rights activists of the 1960s were able to give the constitutional freedoms that the black people of this country were supposed to be given in the mid 1800s. Todays gun control activists are different than those of the past. They say that gun violence in this country has gotten to a point where something must be done to stop it. They would like to see criminals disarmed, and they want the violence to stop. However, they are going about it in the wrong way. While claiming that they want to take guns out of the hands of criminals, they work to pass laws that would take the guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens instead. For this reason the, efforts for gun control do not address the real problems of crime. The simple definition of a criminal is someone who does not obey the law. The simple definition of a law-abiding citizen is someone who does obey the law. Therefore, if we pass laws restricting ownership of firearms, which group of people does it affect? The simple answer is that gun control laws affect law-abiding citizens only. By their very nature, criminals will continue to violate these new laws, they will continue to carry their firearms, and they will find their efforts at crime easier when they know that their victims will be unarmed. Innocent people are turned into victims when new laws make it impossible for them to fight back. An unarmed person stands little chance against an armed one. There have been laws passed that force citizens to go through a registration process to purchase a firearm. It is the law-abiding citizens who are going through these processes of getting permits so they may legally carry a firearm. The people who go through this legal process do not want t o break the law. The people who do intend to break the law will carry their guns whether or not the law allows them. .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .postImageUrl , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:hover , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:visited , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:active { border:0!important; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:active , .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2 .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf7ddeccea9891104aab5b306e7d7f9e2:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Life without Slim Shady / Eminem / Marshal Mathers EssayCriminals will always find ways to get guns. In this country we have made illegal the use, possession, sale, and transportation of many kinds of narcotics, but it is still easy for anyone to purchase their drug of choice from street corner dealers. Firearms and ammunition would be just as easy to obtain from these black market vendors. Today, criminals often carry illegal weapons, including sawed-off shotguns, machine guns, and even homemade guns, clearly showing disregard for the current laws that make these items illegal. The gun control advocates have argued their case by demonizing the gun itself, rather than addressing the people who commit violent crimes. They attempt to claim that possession of a gun turns average citizens into bloodthirsty lunatics. If legal possession of a firearm caused this sort of attitude, then why are crime rates highest in areas such as Washington D.C., and New York City which have strict gun control laws? And why are crime rates dropping in states such as Florida where private ownership of firearms is encouraged? Simply stated, legal ownership of a gun does not cause crime. The most recent efforts of gun control advocates have been to claim that certain types of guns and ammunition are evil. They assign emotional catch phrases such as assault weapons and cop killer bullets to broad categories of firearms and ammunition in the hopes that people will believe that some guns have an evil nature. Most people who are unfamiliar with firearms do not fully understand what these phrases mean, and they accept the terms being used without question. What people do not often understand is that the term assault weapon has been defined to include all semi-automatic rifles, and cop killer has been defined to include any bullet that can penetrate body armor. It comes as a surprise to most people that a large number of simple hunting rifles can do both. Does ownership of one of these weapons cause people to become mass murderers? It does not, and we must not fall into the trap of blaming the gun for the hand that holds it. The act of making it illegal to own firearms does little to prevent criminals from getting guns. These laws only restrict people who respect the law itself, the people who would only use firearms for legal purposes anyway. And when we give people the right to defend themselves, we find that criminals start looking for other victims out of fear that they will become the victims themselves. We must work to reduce crime in America, but we should look at the problem realistically, and develop plans that would be effective. It is obvious that the gun control laws are neither realistic, nor effective in reducing crime. Therefore, we must direct our efforts toward controlling crime, not controlling legal ownership of firearms. Words/ Pages : 1,144 / 24